Systems Used and Tested in Migration and Asylum Procedures



There’s no content to show here yet.

From conversation and dialect recognition systems to automated decision-making software, a multitude of technologies has been used and tested in migration and asylum procedures. These tools can help you streamline bureaucratic processes and expedite decisions, benefitting government authorities and some migrant workers, but they also set up new weaknesses that require new governance frames.

Refugees encounter numerous road blocks as they search for a safe house in a new country, where they can build a lifestyle for themselves. To do this, they need to contain a safeguarded way of proving who they are to be able to access public services and work. One example is Everest, the world’s initial device-free global payment answer platform that helps refugees to verify all their identities with no need for newspaper documents. In addition, it enables them to build savings and assets, so that they can become self-sufficient.

Other technology tools can help boost refugees’ employment leads by coordinating them with neighborhoods where they are going to flourish. Germany’s Match’In project, for instance, uses an algorithm fed with relevant data on web host municipalities and refugees’ specialist experience to set them in places where they are likely to find careers.

But these kinds of technologies may be subject to personal privacy concerns and opaque decision-making, potentially leading to biases or perhaps errors that can lead to expulsions in violation of world-wide law. And in addition to the dangers, they can generate additional limitations that prevent refugees out of reaching their final destination : the safe, welcoming country they aspire to live in. A/Prof. Ghezelbash can be described as senior lecturer in abri and immigration law on the University of New South Wales (UNSW). This individual leads the Access to Rights & Technology stream for the Allen’s Centre for Rules, Technology and Innovation. His research ranges the areas of law, calculating, anthropology, worldwide relations, politics science and behavioural psychology, almost all informed by his unique refugee qualifications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *